Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '20 at 19:08
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 118
2-Core 231
85% 146 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 681
74% 571 Pts
64-Core 690
46% 690 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 9.91
12% 12.5 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 14.7
7% 12.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 12%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 256GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 270 268 270 270 270 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,408
Write 705
Mixed 122
SusWrite 280
137% 629 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 44.9
207% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 478
DQ Mixed 153
185% 318 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 153%
Great: 274%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$38
25GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 54 38 38 42 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 435
Write 74.2
Mixed 92.3
SusWrite 46.5
35% 162 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 17.8
79% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 18.1
47% 100 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 80%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
292GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 100 105 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 150
Write 132
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 105
76% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $339
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $268Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback