PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision WorkStation T7500 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 06FW8P |
Memory | 24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181015 |
Uptime | 3.3 Days |
Run Date | Sep 17 '20 at 12:12 |
Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
Run User | EGY-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
|
67.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung MZ7LN256 256GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 54 43 39 33 34 MB/s
|
58.1%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
135GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 102 102 102 102 MB/s
|
57.6%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
14GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 69 68 70 MB/s
|
56.1%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
228GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 101 104 105 105 MB/s
|
62.1%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples | 163x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 88x |
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples | 74x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 61x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 54x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 51x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |