Supermicro X9DRT-HF+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemSupermicro X9DRT-HF+  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRT-HF+
Memory10.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150622
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateSep 17 '20 at 11:41
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 41.7
2-Core 100
49% 74.5 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 521
44% 370 Pts
64-Core 1599
107% 1599 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 72%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 239GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 84 62 59 75 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 429
Write 187
Mixed 181
SusWrite 98.8
49% 224 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 27
94% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 171
143% 214 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 76%
LSI Logical Volume 479GB
144GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 244 182 173 157 146 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67% Good
Read 422
Write 382
Mixed 268
SusWrite 202
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 25.1
91% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 202
155% 214 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M393B2G70EB0-CMA 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 18.6
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $299Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback