Asrock B250M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B250M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180316
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '20 at 11:08
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	59.3% Above average	Memory 75.6 1-Core 113 2-Core 202 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 403 38% 318 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8626) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Lighting 38.2 Reflection 29.6 Parallax 36.7 31% 34.8 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 36.5 Splatting 34.2 29% 36 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 424 419 414 411 409 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	218% Outstanding	Read 2,027 Write 1,741 Mixed 1,167 SusWrite 427 298% 1,340 MB/s	4K Read 58.1 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 68.1 236% 80 MB/s	DQ Read 997 DQ Write 692 DQ Mixed 808 613% 832 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 218% Great: 302%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 818GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 392 402 394 396 419 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 403 Write 363 Mixed 364 SusWrite 392 86% 381 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 86.4 4K Mixed 52.9 172% 59.3 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 334 251% 335 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.9% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 10.9 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 4 24% 8.27 GB/s	Latency 89.1 45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B250M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,482 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock B250M Pro4 - $85

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	280x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	232x
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	175x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	176x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	171x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	146x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	55x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	33x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 25,824 samples	35x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	35x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $390

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16