Asus H87M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	98.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '20 at 08:50
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Memory 94.6 1-Core 110 2-Core 231 83% 145 Pts	4-Core 444 8-Core 465 60% 454 Pts	64-Core 475 29% 475 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 8620) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 143 Parallax 122 103% 130 fps	MRender 99.7 Gravity 126 Splatting 108 91% 111 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 353GB free (System drive) Firmware: 90WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 381 399 401 400 387 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 487 Mixed 382 SusWrite 385 99% 439 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 59.4 217% 81.3 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 256 219% 322 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 117%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB 13,609 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 234GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 146 148 147 148 148 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	147% Outstanding	Read 367 Write 161 Mixed 64.4 SusWrite 146 134% 185 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1.6 372% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 147% Great: 213%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 21,220 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.4% Good	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 20.4 63% 21.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 21 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 58.1 69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PLUS - $128

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	131x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	96x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	58x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	57x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $246

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16