Gigabyte B365M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics94.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive302% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte B365M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1824 x 1026 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 17 '20 at 08:36
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 89.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 285
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1,105
99% 838 Pts
64-Core 1,097
68% 1,097 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Asus(1043 8735) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 122
Parallax 112
99% 118 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 99
Splatting 84.5
85% 108 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 1TB
710GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB411D43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1032 822 840 1376 1379 1379 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 2,682
Write 1346
Mixed 1,258
SusWrite 1,138
356% 1,606 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 76.1
255% 89.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,211
DQ Write 841
DQ Mixed 1321
907% 1,125 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 302%
Great: 330%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
598GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 913 507 507 509 507 509 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
430GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 60 61 61 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 67.4
Write 53.6
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 60.2
43% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 69%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
336GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 62 63 62 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 65
Write 71.3
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 62
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 55%
ST2000LM 003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 38.6
Write 41.2
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 42.2
55% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 26%
Generic USB SD Reader 64GB
59GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 18.5
Write 14.3
Mixed 16
SusWrite 14.9
21% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3
193% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5702-084.A00G 99U5702-088.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 21.3
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 22.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B365M DS3H Builds (Compare 9,028 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B365M DS3H - $146

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $550
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback