Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Memory 53.2 1-Core 20.5 2-Core 41 27% 38.2 Pts	4-Core 41 8-Core 40.6 5% 40.8 Pts	64-Core 41.2 2% 41.2 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 21EC) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	0.93% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.39 fps	MRender 1.24 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.26 1% 1.06 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.93% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$55 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 430GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 190 208 196 208 206 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.5% Average	Read 220 Write 209 Mixed 211 SusWrite 200 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 24.6 4K Mixed 17.3 56% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 87.4 DQ Write 87.7 DQ Mixed 78.3 61% 84.5 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4B48583136303043 2x8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 5.4 13% 4.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 4 9% 3.13 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 14%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
E-450 APUAMDBench 26%, 9,307 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	1x

RAM
393955353431372D 2x2GBUnknownBench 10%, 2 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16