User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP
MotherboardHP 8374
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180329
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateSep 17 '20 at 03:18
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A12-9730P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Memory 35.7
1-Core 50.3
2-Core 111
37% 65.7 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 178
24% 175 Pts
64-Core 189
13% 189 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 8374) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
6.41% Terrible
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 34.5
6% 29.3 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 22.2
6% 20.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.41%
Great: 10%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
834GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 154 147 145 146 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 157
Mixed 95.9
SusWrite 145
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC M471A1K43CB1-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
22.9% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 8.6
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 7.3
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 223
18% 223 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $193Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $290Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback