Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Pavilion dv1000 (EW999LA#ABM) (all builds)
Motherboard	Quanta 30A0
Memory	0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060216
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '20 at 00:46
Run Duration	360 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel T1300 47 User benchmarks, average bench 27% U2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Memory 59.1 1-Core 15.6 2-Core 14.6 25% 29.8 Pts	4-Core 11.9 8-Core 12.1 2% 12 Pts	64-Core 12 1% 12 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 34%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHV2080BH 80GB 381 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: 892C SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 7.5 7.5 7.8 16 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	6.18% Terrible	Read 10.2 Write 9.5 Mixed 10.9 SusWrite 11 8% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 69% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.18% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x0.5GB 3,675 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 2 of 2 slots used 1GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.02% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2.5 7% 2.53 GB/s	SC Read 0 SC Write 0 SC Mixed 0.1 0% 0.03 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.02% Great: 15%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16