HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	13% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	16.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160404
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '20 at 16:52
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	88%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 82 1-Core 53.2 2-Core 106 51% 80.5 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 377 39% 315 Pts	64-Core 426 26% 426 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3287) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Lighting 68.9 Reflection 68.2 Parallax 59.4 56% 65.5 fps	MRender 70.8 Gravity 66.3 Splatting 68.3 56% 68.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GB 7,649 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 113 140 139 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	13% Very poor	Read 136 Write 84.1 Mixed 97.6 SusWrite 65.4 21% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 3.6 11% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 101%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 21GB free Firmware: UF360000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 56 76 15 58 38 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 432 Write 214 Mixed 192 SusWrite 51.9 49% 222 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 24.2 4K Mixed 17.6 65% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 73.4 DQ Mixed 37.1 44% 76.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 KHX1866C10D3/8G Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 20GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.7% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14.7 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 14.1 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	684x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	590x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	315x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	137x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	21x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16