Acer Aspire 5755G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 5755G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JV51_HR
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '20 at 09:50
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 57
2-Core 88.9
50% 74.9 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 163
23% 166 Pts
64-Core 159
11% 159 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 0504) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
1.15% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 4.5
2% 6.97 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 9.3
1% 5.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.15%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$67
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 490 509 489 291 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 77% Great: 129%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Aspire 5755G Builds (Compare 366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5755G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $134
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $180Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i7-9700K $300Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback