Lenovo 81FB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 81FB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 15 '20 at 22:15
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 76%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 68
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 153
56% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 437
44% 358 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.11.3
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.1% Average
Lighting 52.4
Reflection 50.5
Parallax 49.6
43% 50.8 fps
MRender 50
Gravity 48.1
Splatting 42.9
38% 47 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L2 256GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0L1QEXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 283 295 290 300 312 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,781
Write 1,484
Mixed 1,095
SusWrite 301
259% 1,166 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 57.9
197% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 650
DQ Write 463
DQ Mixed 576
425% 563 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 175%
Great: 241%
USB3.0 320GB
193GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 13 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 42.7
Mixed 15.1
SusWrite 13.4
19% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 64%
USB3.0 500GB
339GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 13 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 43.4
Write 34
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 13.4
22% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
61.8% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 21.6
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 19.9
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81FB Builds (Compare 272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback