Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	11.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x5-Z8300 3,228 User benchmarks, average bench 24% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Memory 40.5 1-Core 16.6 2-Core 30.9 21% 29.3 Pts	4-Core 56 8-Core 52.5 7% 54.2 Pts	64-Core 51.3 3% 51.3 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1297 2063) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.41% Terrible	Lighting 1.43 Reflection 2.38 Parallax 2.03 1% 1.95 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 2.96 2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.41% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Asmt 2115 240GB 296 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 37 30 37 34 38 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	11.5% Very poor	Read 35.9 Write 39.1 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 34.8 8% 36.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 8.1 4K Mixed 7.9 22% 6.9 MB/s	DQ Read 23.7 DQ Write 22.3 DQ Mixed 21.7 17% 22.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 66%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB 8,778 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 11GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.4 4.4 4.1 4.4 4.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	4.8% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 3.7 Mixed 8.2 SusWrite 4.3 9% 8.48 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 28% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 4.8% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HYNIX 1x2GB 4,904 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.4% Very poor	MC Read 2.4 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 3.9 13% 4.53 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 0.2 4% 1.5 GB/s	Latency 200 20% 200 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16