Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 15 '20 at 10:25
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 224
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 600
64% 509 Pts
64-Core 876
54% 876 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
Asus(1043 86BD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Lighting 93.1
Reflection 84.7
Parallax 81.2
76% 86.3 fps
MRender 70.1
Gravity 78.2
Splatting 73.5
61% 74 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 256GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM01D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 136 134 127 120 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 495
Write 315
Mixed 263
SusWrite 138
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 36.5
129% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 145
160% 272 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 107%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
47GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,530
Write 1,586
Mixed 1,314
330% 1,477 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 65.9
220% 78.8 MB/s
DQ Read 905
DQ Write 598
DQ Mixed 828
597% 777 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 237%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0810GWRZWF 1TB
236GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 79 79 78 78 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.6% Below average
Read 56.1
Write 61.6
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 78
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 24
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 21.2
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,383 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $480
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback