Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130514
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 14 '20 at 17:41
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 195
79% 132 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 547
61% 467 Pts
64-Core 553
37% 553 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$334
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.4% Very good
Lighting 303
Reflection 287
Parallax 304
80% 298 fps
MRender 268
Gravity 258
Splatting 185
77% 237 fps
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 91%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 230 222 215 211 217 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 439
Mixed 388
SusWrite 221
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 41.8
136% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 364
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 123%
WD WD7500AZEX-00ZF5A0 750GB
697GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 139 141 140 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 145
Write 140
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 140
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 93%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$55
214GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 44.3
Write 60.3
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 45.9
34% 46.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,139
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback