| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190625 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 14 '20 at 12:07 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
76.2%
Very good
|
76% 134 Pts
|
53% 395 Pts
|
25% 407 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.8%
Poor
|
32% 35.8 fps
|
20% 27.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 75 70 81 70 MB/s
|
36.1%
Below average
|
56% 77.1 MB/s
|
114% 0.6 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 16GB
2GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 6.1 5.3 6.1 6.2 5.8 MB/s
|
6.51%
Terrible
|
8% 5.85 MB/s
|
106% 2.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
40.1%
Average
|
38% 13.4 GB/s
|
35% 12.2 GB/s
|
54% 73.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,908 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 1,112x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 637x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 553x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 838x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 467x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 366x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $197 |