Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 14 '20 at 00:58
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 80.1
1-Core 153
2-Core 303
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 1,023
95% 792 Pts
64-Core 1,428
88% 1,428 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4996) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 120
Parallax 113
92% 115 fps
MRender 95.5
Gravity 104
Splatting 84.9
77% 94.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 480GB-$139
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 53 70 51 50 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 484
Write 397
Mixed 391
SusWrite 72.2
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 26.8
91% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 92.5
DQ Mixed 1
42% 105 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59%
Great: 90%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
10GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 377
Write 186
Mixed 245
59% 269 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 43.5
152% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 172
132% 179 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 87%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2592 2598 2602 1659 1586 1608 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
393% Outstanding
Read 2,661
Write 2,590
Mixed 1,968
SusWrite 2,108
524% 2,332 MB/s
4K Read 67.6
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 95.1
321% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,394
DQ Write 1,200
DQ Mixed 1,296
972% 1,297 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 393%
Great: 435%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
41GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 95 95 97 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 37.7
Write 37.9
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 95.4
43% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.3
220% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 75%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
359GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 73 72 74 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 107
Write 97
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 72.8
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 88%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
134GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 121 123 125 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 92.9
Write 91.5
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 124
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 36.7
94% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 37.4
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,799 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback