Asus GL503VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus GL503VM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL503VM
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '20 at 23:27
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 77
2-Core 154
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 299
40% 300 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1002 128GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4131002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 101 84 80 82 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 425
Write 316
Mixed 188
SusWrite 92.5
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 27.4
83% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 188
160% 239 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 87%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
789GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 116 122 121 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 98.1
Write 121
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 120
72% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 12
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL503VM Builds (Compare 550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Asus GL503VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback