Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 49.3 2-Core 97.3 53% 80 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 247 26% 207 Pts	64-Core 252 16% 252 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79 79,894 User benchmarks, average bench 14% AMD(1002 0B04) 2GB CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.8.3 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Lighting 16.8 Reflection 27.8 Parallax 19.2 14% 21.3 fps	MRender 25.3 Gravity 14.3 Splatting 29.3 19% 23 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 120GB 486 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 183 80 79 80 80 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 400 Write 264 Mixed 292 SusWrite 140 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 75.5 4K Mixed 31.6 124% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 31.4 DQ Write 70 DQ Mixed 22.4 25% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 85%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 371GB free Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 109 111 112 112 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 106 Write 99.4 Mixed 56.3 SusWrite 110 68% 92.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 13.3 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 11 25% 8.67 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $517

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16