Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	59.3% Above average	Memory 90.7 1-Core 64.4 2-Core 110 57% 88.3 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 205 23% 181 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 4,405 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 02EB) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	3.59% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 6.23 Parallax 2.78 4% 4.43 fps	MRender 4.57 Gravity 2.97 Splatting 5.91 4% 4.48 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.59% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 213GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 234 216 213 212 211 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.8% Above average	Read 246 Write 234 Mixed 227 SusWrite 219 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 42.2 4K Mixed 29.4 84% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 197 147% 195 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273BH1-CH9 2x4GB 169 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	39.8% Below average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 13.1 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 10.5 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4650ATIBench 3%, 4,405 samples	83x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	5x
EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 2x2GBUnknownBench 27%, 1,533 samples	5x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 80AD HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GBUnknownBench 30%, 157 samples	4x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $220

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16