Asus 1215N

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	3.04% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus 1215N (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK 1215N
Memory	6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110505
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '20 at 19:56
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	70%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D525-$250 2,196 User benchmarks, average bench 23% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Memory 47.4 1-Core 7.9 2-Core 13.8 19% 23 Pts	4-Core 25.1 8-Core 25.1 3% 25.1 Pts	64-Core 25.4 2% 25.4 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia ION 1,623 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 8446) 512MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.17.12.5743 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	1.04% Terrible	Lighting 1.03 Reflection 2.19 Parallax 0.41 1% 1.21 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.61 1% 1.77 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 1.04% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba THNSNC128GBSJ 128GB 611 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: CJTA SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 24 20 20 18 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	3.04% Terrible	Read 29.6 Write 44 Mixed 22.4 SusWrite 23.2 7% 29.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.2 2% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 3.04% Great: 49%
Patriot Memory 253GB 284 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 132GB free, PID 6000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 20 18 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 28.9 Write 20.7 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 19.1 29% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 58% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.93 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3.9 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 171 24% 171 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 1215N Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 23%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus 1215N

CPU
Atom D525Intel $250Bench 23%, 2,196 samples	5x

GPU
IONNvidiaBench 1%, 1,623 samples	5x

SSD
PH6-CE240-L1 240GBBench 69%, 312 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	1x

RAM
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 24% - Poor

Total price: $250

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16