Acer Aspire V3-772

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Acer Aspire V3-772 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer VA70_HW
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140307
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '17 at 11:27
Run Duration	311 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4702MQ 21,618 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 87.9 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 172 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 463 49% 389 Pts	64-Core 459 28% 459 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 0781) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3071 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.49% Terrible	Lighting 4.97 Reflection 6.54 Parallax 6.53 4% 6.01 fps	MRender 9.29 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 7.7 5% 6.45 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.49% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNS256GMCP 256GB 243 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: TA2ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 907 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2389 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 200 200 0 (A9) Unknown 120 120 328339038 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 189 189 30088167515 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 0 0 13 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 0 0 1540 (C2) HDA temperature 48 29 304942678068 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 19728 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 0 0 4837 (F2) Unknown 0 0 9824	87% Excellent	Read 489 Write 268 Mixed 231 72% 329 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 23.7 140% 55 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 68.1 96% 176 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 87%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 207GB free Firmware: AX003J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1719 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 42007 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 6869 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2388 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 9 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 130 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 79323 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 201864445984 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 91 91 3883 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 258 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	47.3% Average	Read 84 Write 80.8 Mixed 31.9 48% 65.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.17 4K Mixed 0.19 57% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 62%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 29GB free, PID 1000, Transcend Jetflash 700 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 36 Write 6.23 Mixed 12 18% 18.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.66 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.02 53% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 58%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	8.55% Terrible	Read 32 Write 12.8 Mixed 8.27 18% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.009 18% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.55% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KBG/8G 2x8GB 639 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 17.3 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 19.9 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire V3-772 Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-772

CPU
Core i7-4702MQIntelBench 61%, 21,618 samples	322x
Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples	82x
Core i7-4600MIntelBench 56%, 7,260 samples	3x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	293x
GTX 760MNvidiaBench 11%, 1,775 samples	61x
GeForce GT 750MNvidiaBench 8%, 13,088 samples	59x

SSD
525 Series mSATA 120GBIntel $119Bench 63%, 655 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
HG5d Q Series mSATA 128GBToshibaBench 74%, 741 samples	12x

RAM
ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,190 samples	34x
ACR16D3LS1KBG/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 51%, 639 samples	30x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 4% - Terrible

Total price: $119

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16