Asus SABERTOOTH Z170 S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive351% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z170 S  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 07:10
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 139
2-Core 266
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 726
74% 596 Pts
64-Core 726
45% 726 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 151
Parallax 125
108% 136 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 133
Splatting 110
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
122GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 75 78 74 77 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 475
Mixed 378
SusWrite 117
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 62.4
218% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 333
233% 292 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
469GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1651 1504 1500 1542 1548 1537 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
351% Outstanding
Read 2,585
Write 2,386
Mixed 1,890
SusWrite 1547
472% 2,102 MB/s
4K Read 65
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 93.9
312% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,324
DQ Write 1,177
DQ Mixed 1,244
935% 1,248 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 351%
Great: 410%
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109
26GB free
Firmware: Z2333000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 172 171 172 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 469
Write 174
Mixed 192
SusWrite 171
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 11.9
108% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 56.9
75% 135 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 71%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
678GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 115 109 111 111 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 83.8
Write 163
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 113
72% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 107%
WD 5000AAC External 500GB
352GB free, PID 0910
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 37.5
Write 40.8
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 42.1
52% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M4A2666C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 27.2
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 24.7
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 61.1
65% 61.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z170 S Builds (Compare 756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z170 S - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $650
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback