Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4000 14,024 User benchmarks, average bench 24% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	28.9% Poor	Memory 42 1-Core 47.2 2-Core 73.4 33% 54.2 Pts	4-Core 91.6 8-Core 95.6 12% 93.6 Pts	64-Core 63.1 4% 63.1 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-000H1 256GB 4,927 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT24H3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 177 175 179 185 179 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 390 Write 236 Mixed 245 SusWrite 190 59% 265 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 45.7 4K Mixed 21.6 76% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 121 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 173 114% 134 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB 48,985 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 6.3 17% 5.87 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 3.3 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 193 21% 193 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium Silver N5030IntelBench 35%, 2,697 samples	321x
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	275x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	222x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	602x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	369x
MX130NvidiaBench 9%, 14,117 samples	44x

SSD
CVB-8D128-HP 128GBSsstcBench 64%, 922 samples	149x
SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBIntelBench 147%, 27,018 samples	95x
MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 14,590 samples	85x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	129x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	100x
RMSA3260NA78HAF-2400 1x8GBRamaxelBench 36%, 7,851 samples	99x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16