Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Memory 33.7 1-Core 14.5 2-Core 30 18% 26.1 Pts	4-Core 32 8-Core 31 4% 31.5 Pts	64-Core 31.7 2% 31.7 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0602) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.982.10.6000 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.84% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.38 Parallax 1.22 1% 1.2 fps	MRender 1.24 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.06 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.84% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot P210 256GB 5,446 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: S112 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 159 179 180 124 16 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.5% Below average	Read 187 Write 142 Mixed 167 SusWrite 121 35% 154 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 23.8 4K Mixed 12.1 45% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 70.6 DQ Write 14.9 DQ Mixed 0.7 11% 28.7 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 12GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 4.7 11% 3.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 3.3 7% 2.43 GB/s	Latency 234 17% 234 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

RAM
ACR256X64D3S13C9G 2x2GBKingstonBench 38%, 1,037 samples	5x
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 23%, 4,045 samples	4x
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 31%, 6,518 samples	3x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $148

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16