Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200805
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 11 '20 at 05:54
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 83.8
1-Core 154
2-Core 306
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 833
89% 709 Pts
64-Core 1,090
67% 1,090 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2435) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.4% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 120
Parallax 104
91% 112 fps
MRender 86.4
Gravity 106
Splatting 91.6
78% 94.8 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 372 369 370 370 375 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 387
Mixed 314
SusWrite 373
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 37.2
141% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 175
138% 192 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95%
Great: 129%
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA1000CM10002 1TB
45GB free
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 312 226 439 435 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 480
Write 414
Mixed 357
SusWrite 313
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 26.4
90% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 153
122% 172 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 114%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
100GB free
Firmware: 03.00C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 54.8
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 56.6
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$41
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 37
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 36.3
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback