Toshiba Satellite C655

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemToshiba Satellite C655  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory1.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '20 at 05:19
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User NIC-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Pentium P6200
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 50.8
2-Core 96.6
45% 70.7 Pts
4-Core 85.3
8-Core 90.7
12% 88 Pts
64-Core 99.5
7% 99.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FDE2) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2189
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.84
1% 0.94 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.57
0% 1.02 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.63%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3265GSXN 320GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH101M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 6.7 24 33 33 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1,463
Write 3
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 21.5
267% 373 MB/s
4K Read 217
27,088% 217 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 48%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 M471B5673FH0-CF8 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
23.3% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 9.3
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Satellite C655 Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C655

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $199
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $192Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback