| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131122 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 11 '20 at 03:48 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 75% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-8120
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
|
41.8%
Average
|
41% 58.3 Pts
|
10% 88.9 Pts
|
10% 166 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.5%
Average
|
44% 56.3 fps
|
48% 59.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 89 89 91 91 MB/s
|
47.5%
Average
|
34% 155 MB/s
|
90% 33.3 MB/s
|
73% 99.5 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
203GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 82 81 82 83 MB/s
|
46.6%
Average
|
54% 73.6 MB/s
|
162% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown F3-12800CL8-4GBXM F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 8GB-64DOJKHHJ 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
|
26.1%
Poor
|
27% 9.43 GB/s
|
9% 3.27 GB/s
|
44% 90.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 564x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 138x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 80x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 67x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 62x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 59x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $610 |