| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 5.53% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Dell Precision M4400 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0R906R |
| Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130604 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 10 '20 at 21:10 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
43.5%
Average
|
43% 66.1 Pts
|
11% 82.5 Pts
|
5% 84.1 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro FX 770M
Dell(1028 0250) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
|
2.24%
Terrible
|
2% 2.61 fps
|
3% 3.55 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung PB22-JS3 FDE 2.5" 256GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VBM9LD1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 31 3.5 7.9 73 86 MB/s
|
5.53%
Terrible
|
3% 12.7 MB/s
|
8% 2.2 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 195 225 212 174 210 MB/s
|
52.6%
Above average
|
49% 218 MB/s
|
77% 25.9 MB/s
|
47% 88.2 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
19.2%
Very poor
|
17% 5.87 GB/s
|
16% 5.73 GB/s
|
43% 93.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision M4400 Builds (Compare 31 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Precision M4400
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo T9900Intel $160Bench 41%, 1,008 samples | 5x |
| Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples | 5x |
| Core2 Extreme X9100Intel $150Bench 41%, 548 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $203 |