PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 68.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P7P55D (all builds) |
Memory | 6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100325 |
Uptime | 6.9 Days |
Run Date | Sep 10 '20 at 18:43 |
Run Duration | 189 Seconds |
Run User | BEL-User |
Background CPU | 43% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
68.6%
Good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung Portable SSD T5 2TB
462GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 21 22 22 22 MB/s
|
8.25%
Terrible
|
|||
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
315GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 22 23 23 23 MB/s
|
11%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 44 31 34 48 49 MB/s
|
33.1%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
192GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 45 34 38 48 50 MB/s
|
38.1%
Below average
|
|||
General UDisk 2GB
1GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.2 5.5 5.5 5.2 5.5 MB/s
|
4.94%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 397x |
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 251x |
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 177x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 61x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 54x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 45x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $159 |