Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Memory 88.3 1-Core 134 2-Core 268 90% 164 Pts	4-Core 538 8-Core 854 86% 696 Pts	64-Core 1,087 67% 1,087 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 854D) CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2080 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	12.2% Very poor	Lighting 2.83 Reflection 38.7 Parallax 30.7 2% 24.1 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 40.6 Splatting 36.4 31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 36%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 479 Write 463 Mixed 365 97% 436 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 88.6 4K Mixed 51 165% 58.2 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 352 264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FAR 4x8GB 193 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	112% Outstanding	MC Read 42.9 MC Write 45.6 MC Mixed 41.5 124% 43.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 25 SC Mixed 22.5 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 92%, 30,689 samples	5x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GBG.SKILL $182Bench 76%, 7,414 samples	5x
HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 4x4GBKingstonBench 86%, 1,630 samples	3x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $424

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16