Acer Aspire A315-22

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-22  (all builds)
MotherboardSR Rose_SR
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200515
Uptime17.2 Days
Run DateSep 09 '20 at 18:51
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A9-9420e RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Memory 19.9
1-Core 41.3
2-Core 73.1
25% 44.8 Pts
4-Core 70.9
8-Core 83.8
10% 77.4 Pts
64-Core 79.6
5% 79.6 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Acer(1025 1362) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.22
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 2.38
Parallax 1.38
1% 1.62 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.48 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 205 238 206 198 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 367
Write 339
Mixed 299
SusWrite 210
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 13.7
46% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 126
102% 145 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 8GB
1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 4.7
10% 3.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.8
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 321
12% 321 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Aspire A315-22 Builds (Compare 519 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-22

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback