Acer Aspire M5500

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire M5500  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer FG965M
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070618
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 09 '20 at 10:25
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad-$90
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 76.3
1-Core 27.6
2-Core 54.3
38% 52.7 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 110
14% 109 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570
Device(1B0A 90C4) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.72% Terrible
Lighting 8.33
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 10.5
7% 9.44 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 7.57
Splatting 8.43
7% 7.97 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.72%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 65 62 62 60 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37% Below average
Read 66
Write 72.5
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 62.3
47% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback