Asus P7H55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P7H55  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100402
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 09 '20 at 07:15
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 64.3
2-Core 132
60% 95.6 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 263
36% 265 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.1.4
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
34.4% Below average
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 51.6
Parallax 55.5
34% 49.6 fps
MRender 51
Gravity 43.3
Splatting 37.3
35% 43.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 151 185 188 175 181 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.2% Average
Read 188
Write 186
Mixed 176
SusWrite 176
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 27.9
84% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 33.1
DQ Write 67.6
DQ Mixed 41.5
34% 47.4 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 129%
Seagate ST3160813AS 160GB-$139
3GB free
Firmware: CC2F
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 99.5
Write 90.8
Mixed 43
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
116% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
71GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 154 155 158 156 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 156
Write 149
Mixed 77
SusWrite 155
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.9% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.9
21% 7.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 7.2
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55 Builds (Compare 310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7H55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback