ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hp-pavilion KQ505AA-ABA m8517c

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Hp-pavilion KQ505AA-ABA m8517c (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Benicia
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090910
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '20 at 00:31
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Memory 72.7 1-Core 40.6 2-Core 81.6 43% 65 Pts	4-Core 161 8-Core 162 22% 162 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570 12,172 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	3.63% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 6.04 Parallax 4.12 4% 4.92 fps	MRender 4.19 Gravity 3.47 Splatting 4.65 3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.63% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB 27,523 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 149 76 76 76 76 MB/s Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.5% Above average	Read 253 Write 237 Mixed 213 SusWrite 103 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 30.5 110% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 142 112% 156 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 91%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 233GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 141 141 142 141 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	67.5% Good	Read 192 Write 143 Mixed 162 SusWrite 141 36% 159 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 49.8 4K Mixed 42.9 141% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 252 164% 192 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 302%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB 17,781 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 398GB free Firmware: 411040RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 227 233 236 236 237 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65% Good	Read 240 Write 225 Mixed 178 SusWrite 231 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 51.9 4K Mixed 29.1 109% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 150 120% 168 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 115%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140 11,698 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 454GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 113 116 116 116 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 112 Write 107 Mixed 68.7 SusWrite 114 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 6.2 19% 6.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.3 GB/s	Latency 95.3 42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback