Asus M5A78L-M/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '20 at 01:15
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core-$150
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 41.8
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 118
42% 75.5 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 190
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Gigabyte(1458 22F3) 2GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 23.7
15% 23.8 fps
MRender 29.3
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 33.7
22% 26.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 20 21 24 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 70.3
Write 116
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 21.6
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.4
108% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 107%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
106GB free
Firmware: VT100-50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 42 46 46 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 41.1
Write 41.7
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 44.2
29% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 38%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
61GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 6.5 0.6 2.2 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 68.5
Write 38.6
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 9
27% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$80
72GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 44 45 42 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 58.2
Write 56.4
Mixed 36.4
SusWrite 43.4
36% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 41%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
248GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 34 33 32 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 105
Write 35.3
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 32.9
40% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
101% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132
20GB free
Firmware: V5DOA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 41 41 41 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 56.8
Write 59.1
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 39.8
35% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 9.1
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback