Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170320
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '17 at 03:10
Run Duration	275 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 79.3 1-Core 113 2-Core 216 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 688 63% 530 Pts	64-Core 943 58% 943 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1375 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.3.3 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Lighting 74 Reflection 70.3 Parallax 100 60% 81.4 fps	MRender 69.7 Gravity 70.6 Splatting 57.6 53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	146% Outstanding	Read 1,416 Write 867 Mixed 1,050 246% 1,111 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 49.2 4K Mixed 28.4 105% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 80.1 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 18 34% 67.4 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 146% Great: 243%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 58GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 16718 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1481 (B1) Unknown 98 98 40 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 47 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 958 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19329679572	77% Very good	Read 514 Write 409 Mixed 421 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 35.4 4K Mixed 23.4 91% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 80.2 DQ Write 87.8 DQ Mixed 37.5 41% 68.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 35GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4298687959 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -77541339561509 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 207 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 202 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 28 36 85901705244 (C2) HDA temperature 28 36 85901705244 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 4298687959 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 4298687959 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 4298687959 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 785 (EA) Unknown 0 0 479 (F1) Unknown 0 0 479 (F2) Unknown 0 0 572 (F4) Unknown 100 100 2490389	52.2% Above average	Read 508 Write 110 Mixed 154 55% 257 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 41.7 4K Mixed 13.8 71% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 83 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 31.1 41% 72.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 73%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 713 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 154 Write 128 Mixed 112 163% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.22 58% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 70%
SAMSUNG HD501LJ 500GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 200GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	Read 45.3 Write 70.3 Mixed 55.3 77% 56.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.29 53% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 33%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 74GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 140 Write 102 Mixed 95.9 137% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.27 50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 67%
Adata S102 Pro USB 3.0 16GB-$22 1,656 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 14GB free, PID 312b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27% Poor	Read 116 Write 25.5 Mixed 44.5 63% 62.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.66 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3200C DDR4 2x8GB 1,740 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (98^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	99% Outstanding	MC Read 40.5 MC Write 35 MC Mixed 33 103% 36.2 GB/s	SC Read 22.9 SC Write 38.3 SC Mixed 25.8 83% 29 GB/s	Latency 81.8 49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)