Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	81.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150911
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '20 at 18:10
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Memory 93.9 1-Core 140 2-Core 280 95% 172 Pts	4-Core 523 8-Core 1,038 92% 781 Pts	64-Core 1,454 90% 1,454 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% EVGA(3842 2992) CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 113 Parallax 100 85% 106 fps	MRender 88.6 Gravity 97.6 Splatting 87.7 74% 91.3 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB 10,220 User benchmarks, average bench 331% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 958 1142 1117 1106 1112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	224% Outstanding	Read 1,278 Write 1,172 Mixed 1,134 SusWrite 973 256% 1,139 MB/s	4K Read 57.3 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 80.1 269% 95.6 MB/s	DQ Read 722 DQ Write 629 DQ Mixed 668 503% 673 MB/s
Poor: 221% ↑ This bench: 224% Great: 431%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 263GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6,137 Write 5,969 Mixed 5,801 1,334% 5,969 MB/s	4K Read 467 4K Write 238 4K Mixed 253 1,157% 319 MB/s	DQ Read 881 DQ Write 642 DQ Mixed 716 547% 746 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 8x8GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM 2200 MHz clocked @ 2343 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	MC Read 55.1 MC Write 49.3 MC Mixed 46 143% 50.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 27.3 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 60.1 66% 60.1 ns
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 163%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	38x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	28x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	21x

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $770

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16