| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK FX505DT |
| Memory | 9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191224 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 06 '20 at 17:25 |
| Run Duration | 89 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
65%
Good
|
70% 126 Pts
|
56% 464 Pts
|
35% 570 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20.36.03
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.7%
Average
|
43% 48.8 fps
|
42% 50.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
478% 2,149 MB/s
|
243% 80.7 MB/s
|
515% 674 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown PSD48G213381S Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 16GB
2133, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
74.9%
Very good
|
77% 27 GB/s
|
68% 23.9 GB/s
|
36% 111 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,813 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples | 1,359x |
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 946x |
| Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples | 507x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |