| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 24.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Gigabyte A320M-H |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200803 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 06 '20 at 13:56 |
| Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
| Run User | SWE-User |
| Background CPU | 49% |
PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.2%
Very good
|
66% 116 Pts
|
53% 397 Pts
|
24% 396 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.1%
Poor
|
26% 28.2 fps
|
26% 32.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1C2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 25 43 47 21 31 MB/s
|
24.6%
Poor
|
17% 79.5 MB/s
|
33% 13.9 MB/s
|
37% 50.3 MB/s
|
|
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 16GB
14GB free, PID db8a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 31 30 32 32 MB/s
|
26.2%
Poor
|
50% 45.9 MB/s
|
82% 2.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS8G4D30CESTK.8FD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
|
50.5%
Above average
|
50% 17.3 GB/s
|
50% 17.6 GB/s
|
41% 96.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,880 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 331x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 324x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $85Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 281x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 224x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 192x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 171x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $233 |