Acer Aspire A315-22

Performance Results

Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 20%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-22  (all builds)
MotherboardSR Rose_SR
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200515
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 06 '20 at 08:22
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Memory 25.6
1-Core 26.6
2-Core 33.6
19% 28.6 Pts
4-Core 46.2
8-Core 36.6
6% 41.4 Pts
64-Core 15.7
1% 15.7 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Acer(1025 1362) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 20.10.22
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.89% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 2.38
Parallax 1.38
1% 1.61 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 1.78
1% 1.48 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.89%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 163 224 186 141 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 406
Write 274
Mixed 290
SusWrite 178
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 17.1
60% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 87.8
DQ Write 81.9
DQ Mixed 85.3
64% 85 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 152%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.07% Terrible
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 0.3
2% 0.73 GB/s
Latency 282
14% 282 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 9.07%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Aspire A315-22 Builds (Compare 479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-22

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback