Performance Results


Gaming 141% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 139% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING H470-PRO (all builds)
Memory	59 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200527
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '20 at 23:01
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900-$274 11,130 User benchmarks, average bench 94% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Memory 80.9 1-Core 154 2-Core 298 96% 177 Pts	4-Core 539 8-Core 890 87% 714 Pts	64-Core 1,354 84% 1,354 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% PNY(196E 12FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	159% Outstanding	Lighting 220 Reflection 235 Parallax 244 179% 233 fps	MRender 264 Gravity 212 Splatting 140 161% 205 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB 27,887 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 382GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT22B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 454 457 457 451 457 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 483 Mixed 344 SusWrite 457 99% 441 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 91.8 4K Mixed 39.5 144% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 277 229% 329 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 22GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 512 Write 456 Mixed 470 107% 479 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 92.8 4K Mixed 54.2 181% 62.8 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 351 265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate ST3000NM0053 3TB 816 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 492GB free Firmware: G00A SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 108 109 110 110 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 112 Write 114 Mixed 73.6 SusWrite 110 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 194% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMWX16GC3200C16W2E 4x16GB 243 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	69.7% Good	MC Read 24.6 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 21.8 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 21.8 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 78.9 51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 133%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 122%

UFO

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 110%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	22x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	22x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	17x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
CRAS C710 M.2 NVMe SSD 512GBKlevvBench 184%, 1,830 samples	15x
CT500P 500GBNvmeBench 170%, 3,338 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GBCorsairBench 46%, 5,076 samples	9x
KD48GU880-32A160X 2x8GBKLEVVBench 84%, 658 samples	7x
KD4AGUA8M-32N2200 1x16GBKLEVVBench 43%, 24 samples	7x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $578

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16