Asrock Z270M-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	74.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z270M-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161027
Uptime	21 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '20 at 09:47
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Memory 96.2 1-Core 140 2-Core 282 96% 173 Pts	4-Core 549 8-Core 548 73% 549 Pts	64-Core 549 34% 549 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 5173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.9% Very good	Lighting 90.5 Reflection 101 Parallax 78.6 74% 89.9 fps	MRender 92.6 Gravity 91.3 Splatting 97.9 77% 93.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 173 92 84 98 50 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 495 Write 447 Mixed 152 SusWrite 139 68% 308 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 78.8 4K Mixed 33.3 116% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 130 136% 226 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 88%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 12GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 499 Write 485 Mixed 396 103% 460 MB/s	4K Read 47.7 4K Write 125 4K Mixed 64.1 221% 79.1 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 356 269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GB 14,178 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	MC Read 35.6 MC Write 37.3 MC Mixed 28.3 96% 33.7 GB/s	SC Read 21.1 SC Write 35.7 SC Mixed 29.7 82% 28.8 GB/s	Latency 53.1 75% 53.1 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270M-ITX/ac

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	153x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	75x
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	53x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	47x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	12x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	11x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 14,178 samples	33x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	24x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $402

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16