Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	93.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8603
Memory	6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191209
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '20 at 07:02
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 99.8 2-Core 187 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 286 8-Core 473 46% 380 Pts	64-Core 566 35% 566 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile) 4,380 User benchmarks, average bench 112% HP(103C 8603) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	93.9% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 122 Parallax 122 96% 120 fps	MRender 150 Gravity 109 Splatting 83.3 90% 114 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB 20,171 User benchmarks, average bench 174% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD70H1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,682 Write 349 Mixed 1,030 223% 1,020 MB/s	4K Read 43.1 4K Write 69.4 4K Mixed 53.1 170% 55.2 MB/s	DQ Read 866 DQ Write 597 DQ Mixed 269 326% 577 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 235%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 69GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 351 358 378 335 325 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Read 386 Write 386 Mixed 356 SusWrite 349 83% 369 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 26.2 4K Mixed 16.4 59% 19.6 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 94.9 DQ Mixed 107 78% 101 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 97%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 890GB free Firmware: RPM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 164 167 168 169 166 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Read 148 Write 150 Mixed 66 SusWrite 167 97% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.6 159% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	61.9% Good	MC Read 24 MC Write 23.3 MC Mixed 21 65% 22.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 16.6 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

GPU
GeForce RTX 2070NvidiaBench 89%, 5,557 samples	446x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	411x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	318x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	258x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	207x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	97x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	378x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	120x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	113x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16