Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-XA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-XA (all builds)
Memory	24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200319
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '20 at 03:58
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	GTM-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Memory 84.4 1-Core 125 2-Core 249 85% 153 Pts	4-Core 441 8-Core 676 69% 559 Pts	64-Core 806 50% 806 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q) 10,818 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Gigabyte(1458 75A5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 90.8 Reflection 102 Parallax 94.9 74% 96 fps	Gravity 88.8 Splatting 88.3 78% 88.5 fps
Poor: 52% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2073 2171 2182 2017 1601 1576 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	290% Outstanding	Read 1,175 Write 2,238 Mixed 1,358 SusWrite 1,936 382% 1,677 MB/s	4K Read 53.1 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 76 240% 82.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,227 DQ Write 997 DQ Mixed 1,090 822% 1,105 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 290% Great: 435%
Lacie Rugged Mini USB3 5TB 200 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 976GB free Firmware: 153E SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 89 88 85 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 67.3 Write 90.4 Mixed 69.8 SusWrite 86.9 58% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.5 171% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 69%
hp v295w 64GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 51GB free, PID 6b40 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.8 2.7 4.6 4.8 4.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	5.25% Terrible	Read 21.1 Write 5.7 Mixed 11.7 SusWrite 4.4 12% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.25% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FE 2x16GB 538 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	76.2% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 23.8 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 23.2 69% 24 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AERO 15-XA Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 63%

Destroyer

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 55%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-XA

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	72x
Core i9-9980HKIntelBench 82%, 8,965 samples	10x

GPU
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	48x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	34x

SSD
760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $4Bench 228%, 10,188 samples	40x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	7x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $119Bench 128%, 20,782 samples	5x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	38x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	8x
HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GBKingstonBench 85%, 10,266 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 617% - Outstanding

Total price: $4

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16