Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 04 '20 at 22:35
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10980XE-$1,100
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 81.1
1-Core 133
2-Core 263
87% 159 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 948
84% 713 Pts
64-Core 2,450
152% 2,450 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 147
Parallax 144
99% 137 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 131
Splatting 105
110% 139 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 102%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 204 206 206 205 209 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 431
Write 320
Mixed 226
SusWrite 208
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 37.5
144% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 215
186% 279 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 195 208 210 197 208 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
748GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 109 109 109 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 116
Write 84.2
Mixed 63
SusWrite 108
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
270GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
47% Average
Read 83.8
Write 60.2
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 79.6
50% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47%
Great: 66%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 141 139 140 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 134
Write 136
Mixed 102
SusWrite 140
95% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 108%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 131 131 132 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 128
Write 132
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 132
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.2% Good
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 18.9
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 10.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $777
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback