| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 11% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20151005 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 04 '20 at 19:27 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 21% |
PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.9%
Above average
|
57% 91 Pts
|
32% 271 Pts
|
21% 340 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 452.06
|
54.8%
Above average
|
55% 64.9 fps
|
55% 67.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ct480bx5 0 480GB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 158 196 49 4.5 2.6 MB/s
|
11%
Very poor
|
13% 59.1 MB/s
|
1% 0.23 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
931GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 163 183 195 196 192 MB/s
|
107%
Outstanding
|
107% 149 MB/s
|
147% 1.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 1760 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.7%
Above average
|
54% 18.9 GB/s
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
55% 73.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical N68-GS4 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 221 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 101x |
| FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 43x |
| FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 25x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 44x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 37x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 14x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $134 |