Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121009
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '17 at 01:37
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 82.6 1-Core 52.3 2-Core 99.9 51% 78.3 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 282 29% 235 Pts	64-Core 282 17% 282 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Sapphire(174B E271) CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.2.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Lighting 37.6 Reflection 34 Parallax 45.6 31% 39.1 fps	MRender 30.2 Gravity 31.6 Splatting 38.7 28% 33.5 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDT725032VLA360 320GB 4,752 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: V54OA52A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 109 109 25792282967 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5514 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 20995 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5449 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6023 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6023 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 210454315042 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0	37.4% Below average	Read 67.8 Write 62.2 Mixed 20.6 37% 50.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.34 91% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 40%
WD Elements 1.5TB 5,064 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 283GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 26.2 Write 22.9 Mixed 18.4 28% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.26 72% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 991770 991770 991770 991770 16GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.6% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 10.8 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 8.1 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	35x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $520

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16