Asus P8Z77-M

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-M (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120801
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '20 at 10:21
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 85.7 1-Core 102 2-Core 198 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 464 48% 387 Pts	64-Core 505 31% 505 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1777 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.9% Below average	Lighting 39.2 Reflection 28.3 Parallax 27.8 32% 31.8 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 42 Splatting 36.8 32% 39 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 452GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 349 383 393 403 398 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Read 372 Write 346 Mixed 296 SusWrite 378 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 62.7 4K Mixed 36.9 118% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 34.4 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 45.8 42% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 124%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60 23,997 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 9GB free Firmware: JE3AD70F SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 70 71 70 71 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	Read 67.2 Write 69.3 Mixed 41 SusWrite 70 45% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 50%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 195GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 70 71 70 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 98.2 Write 94.5 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 70.2 57% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.9 148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 14GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.5% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-M Builds (Compare 1,274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	333x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	219x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	179x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	82x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	63x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	58x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	71x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	43x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	35x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	21x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 23,732 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $442

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16