Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 580-$250 1,467 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Memory 43.6 1-Core 55.4 2-Core 98 38% 65.7 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 174 24% 176 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1439) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.66 0% 0.75 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.26 1% 0.94 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 185 212 215 220 264 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.2% Good	Read 240 Write 182 Mixed 219 SusWrite 224 49% 216 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 41.8 4K Mixed 27.7 93% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 184 142% 196 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 90GB free Firmware: EXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 169 146 146 146 146 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.2% Above average	Read 241 Write 201 Mixed 207 SusWrite 154 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 39.5 4K Mixed 32.2 104% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 136 112% 159 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 108%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB 5,405 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 1GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	4.38% Terrible	Read 21.3 Write 2.3 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 5.4 9% 8.57 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.38% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB 10,285 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	23% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 10.4 24% 8.33 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.5 GB/s	Latency 186 22% 186 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3 M 330IntelBench 38%, 14,119 samples	20x
Core i3 M 350Intel $199Bench 38%, 14,351 samples	10x
Pentium T4500IntelBench 34%, 8,800 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon HD 5400ATIBench 1%, 10,400 samples	18x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	14x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	5x

SSD
GOODRAM 120GBBench 68%, 5,433 samples	1x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 5,297 samples	8x
AD73I1B1674EG 2x2GBAdataBench 24%, 184 samples	3x
HP594908-HR1-ELD 2x2GBKingstonBench 24%, 207 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16